 |
| |
|
|
 |
| |
Pitfalls of Limited Tort
|
|
| |
Limited vs Full

|
|
 |
| |
Teenage Drivers
|
|
| |
Your teenager has reached that magical age and is asking
the dreaded question, "Mom, Dad, can I get my driver's
license?

|
|
 |
| |
Accident Points
|
|
| |
Find out how they are applied

|
|
 |
| |
Surcharges
|
|
| |
What are they and how do they work

|
|
 |
| |
Accidents
|
|
| |
What to do and what information you should collect

|
|
 |
| |
Rental Cars
|
|
| |
Do you have the coverage you need? Find out now before
you go on a trip

|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
| |
|
|
| |

|
Automobile Insurance
|
| |
 |
| |

|
Pitfalls of Limited Tort
BRIEF1
Long v. Mejia, Pennsylvania Superior
Court, No. 1032 EDA 2005 - Decided March 30, 2006
Facts: Plaintiff Long was struck from
behind by a car driven by Defendant Mejia. The damages to
Long's car totaled $1,720. Long additionally injured his
neck, back, left shoulder and wrist in the accident. Long
had selected the limited tort option with his automobile
policy.
Procedure: The case went to trial, where
the Common Pleas court held, due to the testimony of Long
and his doctor, that the injuries represented a "serious
impairment of a bodily function" so as to exceed the limited
tort threshold. The Court awarded Long $10,000 in
non-economic damages, in addition to his property damage.
Defendant appealed this decision to the Superior Court.
Issue: What is necessary for an injury to
be considered serious, such that an insured with the limited
tort option may sue for non-economic damages?
Holding: While there is no set definition
for a "serious injury", the impact an injury has on an
individual is now a key factor.
Reasoning: The most severe and lasting of
Long's injuries was the wrist injury. Long was diagnosed
with Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy (RSD). The problems with
Long's wrist were considered permanent and as a result of
the auto accident.
Because of the wrist injury, Long, a construction
worker, could no longer control tools like jackhammers and
compressors he used. Long had no training to do anything
other than be a laborer and the wrist injury limited his
ability to lift anything over 35 pounds. Long had to use
extreme caution when playing with his grandchildren, and was
unable to perform recreational activities he was involved in
prior to the accident.
1 This Brief is not a legal opinion and should not be
relied upon as such. The intent of this document is to
provide a general background regarding the topics discussed,
not to provide legal advice. Producers and agencies should
consult an attorney regarding specific situations and
specific questions with respect to the topic or topics
covered in this document. Neither the Insurance Agents and
Brokers nor any of its employees shall be responsible for
any errors or omissions regarding any statements made in
this document, nor any errors or omissions regarding any
statutes, regulations, court rules, and/or any other
government documents cited in this document.
In an interesting analysis, the Court examined a
Hypothetical injury of a broken pinky finger. the Court
stated that such an injury is not likely to present a
significant impairment for the average person. However,
quoting the Court, "if that broken finger is suffered by a
person who requires fine motor skills to retain employment,
a concert violinist or neurosurgeon for example, then what
is of little import to one person becomes hugely significant
to another."
Comment: Agents should be aware of this case so as to
provide a better understanding to clients when discussing
the full tort, limited tort option. Agents should explain
that the limited tort option is not a complete bar to
non-economic damages. It should be explained that where an
injury has a severe impact on one's livelihood, a court may
be more inclined to award damages.
It must be noted that the court only awarded $10,000 of
non-economic damages in this case, a relatively small
amount. It will be interesting to see how courts will apply
this standard when much higher damages are sought. it can
also be anticipated that the courts will seek to narrow and
further define this issue, as more limited tort plaintiffs
will now sue for such damages.
Should you have any additional questions or concerns
with this case, please contact the IA&B Member Service
Center at (717) 795-9100.
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
 |
| |
 |
Call us with your questions at 610-869-4065
|
| |
|
Outside of the 610 area? Call us toll free at
800-435-4565
Our fax number is 610-869-8565
Or drop us a line at
yerkes@yerkesinsurance.com and we'll be
in touch within two business days.
RETURN
TO TOP
|
|